Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisors discuss moving tax due date and bill frequency; staff to gather additional input
Summary
A small constituent survey and board discussion prompted supervisors to consider changing the county tax due date from December toward October/November and evaluate a twice-a-year billing option; board asked staff to analyze impacts before any policy change.
Get email alerts on the Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Supervisor Robinson presented constituent feedback on whether to change the real-estate tax due date or move to biannual collections, reporting that a quick survey of 88 residents split roughly between keeping annual billing and moving to biannual.
"The outlook was pretty close. It was 25 for biannual, and keeping it annual was 29 people," Robinson told the board, and members discussed moving the due date earlier in the fall to avoid the December holiday period. Several supervisors noted that residents can already pay monthly or quarterly through the treasurer's office, but that changing the official due date or frequency affects the treasurer and commissioner-of-revenue workflows and cash-flow timing for the county budget.
Members asked staff to collect further input from adjacent counties, the treasurer and constitutional officers, and to return with analysis of operational costs, effects on cash flow, and mailing/timing consequences before any formal vote.
What's next: Staff will gather input and prepare a work-session-level analysis for a future meeting; no policy change was adopted Dec. 18.
