Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Design Review topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission denies front‑fence design at Monticello Avenue, says design too utilitarian
Summary
The commission denied a design‑review application for a fence at 104 Monticello Avenue, finding the front-facing, utilitarian fence inconsistent with Piedmont's design guidelines and recommending redesign or denial followed by reapplication if the applicant wants to address concerns.
The planning commission voted to deny the fence/wall design application for 104 Monticello Avenue after commissioners concluded the proposed fence is too utilitarian for a front-facing, corner lot and does not meet Piedmont’s design‑review guidelines. The applicant was not present; commissioners debated options including continuing the application to allow the applicant to appear, approving as designed, or denying so the owner would need to submit revised plans. Chair Rowland and multiple commissioners said the fence lacked architectural distinction expected for a prominent front/side location and referenced guideline 3.09 as not met.
Commissioner Rowland moved to deny the application on the grounds that the fence design does not comply with policy 29.5 and guideline 3.09. Commissioners cited the applicant’s decision to enclose a larger portion of the yard with utilitarian fencing and noted the commission’s past experience that foliage covering utilitarian fencing may fail and leave unattractive exposures. The motion to deny was seconded and passed by roll call; staff advised the applicant to consult with staff about design alternatives if they wish to reapply.
