Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

SANB board reviews final reading of 2025–26 budget draft ahead of June vote

St. Anthony-New Brighton School Board · May 20, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its May 20 work session the St. Anthony–New Brighton School Board received a final reading of the proposed 2025–26 budget draft. Administration presented revenue and expenditure estimates, proposed staffing changes and a $300,000 list of reductions; formal adoption is scheduled for June 3.

The St. Anthony–New Brighton School Board on May 20 received a final reading of the district’s proposed 2025–26 budget and heard from administration about revenue projections, staffing changes and planned reductions ahead of a June 3 adoption vote.

Superintendent Renee Corneille and Executive Director of Academics Hope Fagerland presented a draft that shows proposed general fund revenue of $26.96 million and proposed expenditures of $26.58 million. The presentation documents an estimated net general-fund surplus of $375,466 under the draft and projected unassigned general-fund balance of roughly $3.09 million entering the year. Key revenue drivers cited in the draft include projected basic general education aid of $7,480.50 per pupil unit and an operating referendum levy expected to yield about $5.74 million.

The draft enumerates planned staffing increases of about 3.60 full-time equivalents, including an ELL teacher and additional ADSIS staffing at the high school and middle school, and lists estimated cost pressures (health‑insurance +5%, utilities +6%). It also itemizes $300,000 in proposed reductions intended to help balance the plan, including $175,000 tied to district administration’s Effective Instruction components, a $40,000 reduction tied to the superintendent executive assistant position, and smaller savings in technology and athletics. The document recommends continuing a Q‑Comp reserve because of a potential state funding change in 2027.

The board did not adopt the budget at the work session; members were presented with the draft and scheduled a formal vote at the June 3 regular meeting. The budget materials presented to the board include line‑by‑line program budgets, fund balance projections for general, food-service and capital funds, and narrative assumptions about enrollment (district planning enrollment of about 1,840 ADM after PSEO adjustments).