Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the District Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Brookings-Harbor board approves multiple policy updates, superintendent evaluation timeline and goals

Brookings-Harbor School District School Board · September 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Brookings-Harbor School District board unanimously approved several policy actions, the superintendent's 2025—6 evaluation timeline and annual goals during its Sept. 17 meeting. Votes on consent and policy readings were 5-0.

The Brookings-Harbor School District board voted unanimously Sept. 17 to approve several policy items, the superintendent's 2025—6 evaluation timeline and annual goals.

Board Member Janece Payne moved to approve first reads of multiple policy items, with Alan Nidiffer seconding; the motion passed 5-0. The first-read items included a new JFCEB (Personal Electronic Devices), deletion recommendations for JFCEB and JHCD/JHCDA, and a required new JHCD (Medications). Later the board approved the second and final reading of the CCA Organizational Chart revision; Alan Nidiffer moved and Trish Walker seconded that motion, which passed 5-0 and will be added to the district's online policy book.

The board also approved the Superintendent Annual Evaluation Timeline for 2025—6 (motion by Janece Payne, seconded by Katherine Johnson) and separately approved the Superintendent Annual Goals for 2025—6 (motion by Katherine Johnson, seconded by Alan Nidiffer). Both motions passed unanimously, with roll call recorded as KJ, TW, JP, AN and JT voting Aye.

Why it matters: the approved policies update district rules governing student devices and medication administration; the evaluation timeline and goals set the superintendent's performance priorities and schedule for the coming year. The decisions were procedural and carried on unanimous votes; no amendments or recorded dissents were entered in the meeting minutes.