Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campaign Complaints topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board sends one fair-campaign matter to hearing, closes another; poll-disclosure motion fails
Summary
Counsel recommended closing the LaMundus complaint (board adopted) and sending the Wiggins complaint to hearing (adopted); a separate contested poll-disclosure matter split the board and failed to garner a majority to proceed to hearing.
The board took up three fair campaign complaints. Counsel recommended closing the LaMundus matter after review and the board adopted that recommendation unanimously. In the Wiggins matter counsel said documentary proof showed a candidate represented an organization's endorsement that did not exist and recommended assignment to a hearing officer; the board voted unanimously to send Wiggins to hearing.
A longer contested matter about whether a poll disclosure required filing under disclosure rules produced a split opinion between Democratic and Republican counsel. The board debated whether the person who released the poll was a candidate at the time (testing-the-waters exception vs. candidate status), and a motion to follow Democratic counsel's recommendation to proceed to a hearing failed to secure a majority, so the board will not take the matter to hearing at this time.
Commissioners emphasized procedural fairness and noted differing legal analyses from counsel; the board thanked counsel for preparing comprehensive memos and moved on to adopt an advisory opinion on campaign security expenses later in the meeting.
