Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses 'collapsing enrollment,' territory-transfer criteria and state advocacy
Summary
Trustees debated renaming 'declining enrollment' to 'collapsing enrollment,' explored the fiscal impacts of attendance-based funding, and urged coordinated advocacy with state legislators while awaiting a consultant feasibility study and CDE guidance on criteria.
Get email alerts on the School Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board members devoted a significant portion of the meeting to countywide enrollment trends and the financial pressures that follow from attendance-based funding. One trustee said the term "declining enrollment" understates the problem and urged renaming it "collapsing enrollment" to better capture the seriousness of the issue and push for legislative changes.
"We need to change the term from declining enrollment to collapsing enrollment because it's obvious that these school districts are now... they're not doing this out of malice... they're just trying to figure out how they're going to keep the doors open and the lights on," a trustee said. Trustees discussed contacting Assembly Member Robert Rivas, Assembly Member Addis' office and Senator Laird to advocate for a funding floor or other legislative fixes. The superintendent and staff noted that the county has begun outreach with the California Department of Education on interpretation of criteria related to territory transfers and financial thresholds (including the cited "901" benchmark).

