Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Rezoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission defeats two Bill Moss Road rezoning requests after residents cite safety and water-line concerns
Summary
After an extended public hearing, the Robertson County Commission voted down two rezoning requests for parcels on Bill Moss Road following resident testimony about traffic safety, lot-size compatibility and apparent timing of a new water main, while several other rezoning items advanced with planning staff support.
The Robertson County Commission on Feb. 23 defeated two requests to rezone parcels on Bill Moss Road after multiple residents urged commissioners to preserve the area’s rural character and expressed safety and infrastructure concerns.
Mark Griffith, a nearby property owner, told the commission the proposed RP-80 rezonings “would not preserve the rural character of the area but destroy it” and said his five-acre retirement lot would be devalued if denser development were allowed. Matt Holder, another resident, said a traffic study underestimates the roadway’s safety risks on a curved section and raised alarms about repeated water-line breaks: “It’s convenient that it’s getting replaced now,” he said, referring to a newly started water-main installation near the properties.
Commissioners discussed road widths and planning commission recommendations (some items had 5–1 support) before holding votes. The mayor announced that the first rezoning vote failed, with commissioners recorded as voting against it, and a second related rezoning also failed after roll-call counts were read. The transcript shows planning staff had recommended approval for some items but commissioners cited local road conditions, lack of shoulders and cumulative traffic to justify voting no on the two contested requests.
Other nearby residents reiterated concerns that Bill Moss Road serves as a cut-through to White House Heritage High School and that existing congestion would worsen if additional lots were approved. Doug Prentice and Davis Taylor described past denials by the city for denser development and urged the county to keep lot sizes at five acres.
The hearing record shows several other rezoning items on the agenda received planning commission support and were approved by the full commission later in the meeting. The commission did not adopt any policy changes to county road standards during the session; several speakers asked the highway department to provide technical details about road widths and shoulders, which the mayor said would be a separate follow-up.
