Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Criminal Justice Masterplan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners defer $350,000 jail master-plan vote after heated public comment and questions over funding
Summary
Shelby County commissioners debated a $350,000 request to fund a master plan for relocating the Walter L. Bailey Criminal Justice Center, hearing months of questions about funding, who would run the process, and strong public opposition to the New Chicago site. A motion moved the item to the first committee meeting in October for additional stakeholder work.
Chairman Whaley brought a proposed $350,000 capital improvement fund request for a master plan to evaluate relocating the county jail from 201 Poplar. The resolution would use CIP contingency funding to hire consultants to run a site-and-program study, and it was sponsored by multiple commissioners.
Audrey Tipton, director of administration and finance, told the committee that CIP contingency dollars are normally debt-funded and "not the best contingency" for expenditure-type items, because debt would be repaid over 20 years. Several commissioners said they support moving forward but pressed for clearer funding sources and an open RFP/RFQ procurement process rather than directing the money to a single private owner. Commissioner Sugarman asked whether the sheriff, mayor or finance could contribute and urged that clerks, judges and community stakeholders be included in planning.
Sheriff Floyd Bonner said the county does need a new jail but that he has not taken a public position on a specific site: "I've never said that [where the jail should be built]. All I've ever said was is that we need to build a new jail." He urged deliberation and better coordination among criminal-justice partners before a final decision.
A large public-comment turnout followed, with residents and community leaders urging the commission to remove New Chicago/Firestone from the site list, citing environmental contamination, proximity to schools, traffic, and the risk of further criminalization of North Memphis neighborhoods. Dr. Carnita Atwater told commissioners she would consider legal action if a private property owner received public funds without sufficient community protections, and multiple speakers requested an ad hoc process that includes local residents.
Commissioner Whaley moved to defer the master-plan resolution and return with clearer criteria, RFP language and stakeholder participation; the motion to refer to the first committee meeting in October passed on a roll-call vote (7–3). The committee also added an explicit request that any future RFP/RFQ be open and public, and that staff provide a written scope and timeline ahead of the October hearing.
What happens next: the sponsors will work with the sheriff, judicial partners, county purchasing and community stakeholders to define RFP/RFQ language and a public engagement plan, and the issue returns at the first committee meeting in October.
