Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Campus Master Plan topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews $35.5M base campus master plan and larger stadium option that would require new millage
Summary
Trustees heard a multi‑phase Campus Master Plan outlining a Base program of about $35.5 million and an enhanced option including a stadium that would raise costs to roughly $55.5 million; staff said the base package would require about 1.50 mills over 25 years under the assumptions shown.
The Brecksville-Broadview Heights City School District Board of Education reviewed a multi‑phase Campus Master Plan during its April 14, 2025 special meeting that lays out a Base Campus Master Plan (phases #03–#05) priced at $35,525,114 and an expanded option including a renovated main stadium bringing the total to roughly $55,450,671.
Presenters walked trustees through a phased approach that prioritizes safety and core infrastructure before athletic enhancements. The Base package was presented with an illustrative financing scenario of roughly 1.50 mills for 25 years (5% assumed interest) to cover debt service; the Base plus stadium scenario was shown as requiring approximately 2.40 mills for 25 years (or about 1.90 mills for 35 years) under the slide assumptions.
Phase 1 and 2 work described in the presentation includes demolition of the Middle School art wing (Phase #01; base ~$533,000) and a campus access drive (Phase #02; base $2,402,182.35). Phase #03 was described as a bus-only drive/loop ($15.3 million), intended to separate bus circulation from other campus traffic and improve student safety with a target completion shown as 2027. Later phases (4–6) include multi-field turf complexes, spectator facilities, and a comprehensive main stadium renovation with a Phase #06 cost line of $22,346,997.13.
Slides and staff remarks emphasized the district’s intent to phase work to limit disruption and to plan financing before proceeding to construction of major athletic components. The presentation did not include a formal board vote on any elements; presenters framed the figures as conceptual costs and financing scenarios to guide future board decisions and potential voter actions.
