Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Eucalyptus Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission backs ordinance recommending removal of specified eucalyptus on new builds
Summary
The commission recommended a draft ordinance that would require removal of defined blue gum and red gum eucalyptus species when a new house is constructed, with a rare exception for trees located more than 150 feet from any property line or structure; commissioners debated cost and sentimental concerns before passing the recommendation.
The commission voted to recommend a draft ordinance to the City Council that would require removal of specified eucalyptus species (blue gum and red gum) on properties whenever a new house is constructed, with an exception for trees more than 150 feet from a property line or any structure.
Staff explained the ordinance would apply to eucalyptus species already identified in the municipal code as undesirable and that the 150‑foot exception aims to reduce impacts where the fire hazard would be minimal. Commissioners debated whether a mandatory requirement is appropriate, noting that removal can be costly (estimates given ranged from a few thousand dollars for accessible trees to tens of thousands for large trees requiring specialist climbers). One commissioner said the eucalyptus had been identified by the fire department as problematic and favored limiting the mandate to new construction only; another commissioner urged caution about extending similar mandates to other non‑native species.
After discussion the commission made and seconded a motion to recommend the draft ordinance (staff report SR26179) to the City Council; the motion passed by roll call. Staff will forward the recommended ordinance and the redline attachments to the council for further consideration.
