Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Telecommunications topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning board directs counsel to draft resolution for Verizon tower after detailed review
Summary
After extensive review of the telecommunications application, the Ankrum Planning Board directed counsel to prepare a draft resolution for a 100‑foot monopole on Route 22. The board reviewed camouflage, alternative technologies, underground utilities, decommissioning and renewal requirements and asked for color swatches and a final decommissioning plan.
The Ankrum Planning Board on June 4 reviewed a detailed application for a Verizon wireless telecommunications facility on Route 22 and directed counsel to prepare a draft resolution toward a decision at the July public hearing. The applicant’s representatives and counsel presented studies and memos — including RF consultant Cityscape analyses — asserting the proposal meets local and federal criteria for filling a coverage gap while minimizing visual intrusion.
Applicant counsel summarized legal and technical points and said Cityscape concluded that a 100‑foot monopole is the minimum height necessary to close the coverage gap and that alternative technologies (satellite or distributed antenna systems) would not replicate the required coverage. The board and staff reviewed the site‑plan and special‑use criteria line‑by‑line, covering compatibility with rural character, underground utilities, generator noise modeling, landscaping/screening, co‑location capacity, FAA/Part 77 compliance, and maintenance and inspection reporting. The applicant agreed to provide color swatches for final paint selection and to deliver a decommissioning plan and cost estimate for a removal bond to be reviewed by the board’s engineer. One board member summarized the technical conclusion: “100 foot height is the minimum height necessary,” reflecting consultant findings. The board then voted to direct counsel to prepare a draft resolution so the application can move toward a formal decision; the public hearing remains open with the next scheduled session on July 9.
Why it matters: The application involves federal‑preemption questions (technology preference), local scenic‑corridor policy, long‑term maintenance and potential obligations for removal bonds and renewals. If approved, the facility would close a coverage gap but will require conditions on camouflage, inspections and decommissioning. The board requested a final package of color swatches, the decommissioning plan with cost estimate, and confirmation of underground utility routing.
