Citizen Portal

Get email alerts on the Waterfront Docks topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Planning board approves Myerly L-shaped dock extension despite frontage shortfall

Village of Sodus Point Planning Board · September 16, 2024

Summary

The Planning Board approved the Myerly family's L-shaped dock extension at 8331 South Shore (30'x4' and 35'x6'), creating a second dock even though the property has 116 feet of frontage and the code reference cited requires 150 feet; a waterfront assessment flagged no concerns and the Zoning Board had previously approved the proposal.

The Sodus Point Planning Board approved a preliminary site plan for a dock extension at 8331 South Shore, authorizing an L-shaped expansion (a 30-foot-by-4-foot section and a 35-foot-by-6-foot section) that creates a second dock on a parcel that has 116 feet of shoreline frontage where 150 feet is typically required under Code 86-23.

Vince Myerly and his partner described the L-shaped configuration as necessary "to make it easier to get in and out of their sailboat," and the board noted that the Zoning Board had previously granted approval. Chair Bruce Evener said the waterfront assessment was completed with no concerns flagged. Janine Fogarty moved to approve the dock extension as discussed and William Kedley seconded; the motion passed with recorded votes listed as Evener—aye, Kedley—aye, McKee—aye, Fogarty—aye and Costich—aye.

The board recorded the action as a preliminary site plan approval; members did not describe additional conditions in the meeting minutes. The chair also reminded the public of an upcoming mayoral meeting and the scheduled rehearing for the Tidesides application.

AI generated

The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.

AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.

Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

Source