Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews and considers approving 2024–25 superintendent evaluation instrument
Summary
Administration presented a draft superintendent evaluation instrument (based on TASB) that includes Part I (student performance measures tied to HB3) and Part II (KPIs aligned to district goals). The Board was asked for direction and approval of the instrument and priorities.
Administration presented a draft 2024–25 Superintendent Evaluation Instrument adapted from the TASB recommended instrument. The draft is structured in two parts: Part I — Report on student performance using state and district measures (HB3 literacy and mathematics goals, CCMR measures, MAP and ISIP) — and Part II — Key Performance Indicators aligned to the district’s strategic goals (examples included PLC implementation, staff professional learning participation, and measurable PLC outcomes).
The packet defines a five‑level rating scale (Distinguished; Accomplished; Proficient; Developing; Not Demonstrated), describes required components (student performance must be considered per statute), and lists sample KPIs tied to the district goals. Administration asked the Board to provide direction on priorities and to approve the instrument as the evaluation framework; the agenda packet includes sample scoring rubrics and recommended targets but does not record any final Board vote.
