Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Battery Energy Storage topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Fire chief urges caution as planning board considers battery storage rules

Belgrade Planning Board · August 7, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Belgrade’s fire chief briefed the planning board on firefighting, containment and environmental risks tied to large battery-energy-storage systems, and members discussed relying on NFPA 855 and developer-funded suppression, training and containment measures.

Belgrade Fire Chief Dan McKenzie told the planning board that large battery-energy-storage systems (BESS) pose distinct firefighting challenges for small towns without municipal water or hydrants. He described limits on local manpower and the difficulty of cooling and extinguishing thermal-runaway battery fires, suggesting developer-funded suppression equipment and training for local crews.

"We won't be able to haul enough FEMA mutual aid, but we have to cool these things down," McKenzie said, describing the need for containment options and specialist response. Board members discussed siting thresholds, liners or impermeable membranes to capture leachate, and whether the town could require developers to provide fire suppression and annual training. Members also noted state activity and model ordinances; the board flagged NFPA 855 (the NFPA standard for energy storage systems) as a potential technical reference to adopt or incorporate by reference in any local amendment.

The board tentatively agreed to study NFPA 855 and consult the state fire marshal for guidance before drafting local standards, and suggested developer responsibilities (suppression, liners, decommissioning environmental-site assessments) as likely items to include in any amendment to the Commercial Development Review Ordinance. Members emphasized the need to craft requirements that are enforceable and proportionate to local capacity.