Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Fencing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board OKs fencing at 117 Hotel Street, requires wood substitution and property-line confirmation
Summary
The board approved a certificate of appropriateness for two fences at 117 Hotel Street but required applicants to substitute wood for vinyl where appropriate and to confirm property lines with staff; planning staff said a survey will be needed if property lines are unclear.
The Palatka Historical Preservation Board approved a certificate of appropriateness for two fences at 117 Hotel Street but added conditions aimed at preserving the historic character and avoiding encroachment on neighboring property.
Renee Brown, city planner, presented the application and noted the house is a contributing structure in the South Historic District (c. 1915–1924). Applicants Michael and Paige Thorn identified themselves and explained the proposed fencing layout: front, side and back fences, with a different fence between their home and a neighbor.
Board members and staff questioned the use of vinyl in the historic district. "Typically, the vinyl in a fence is something that we tend to shy away from," a board member said, noting it is not historically correct. The applicants said they were open to alternative materials and that the vinyl section was intended to match the house color. Planning staff confirmed that wood or painted finishes are more period-appropriate and that aluminum is acceptable in some locations.
Neighbor Wayne Bates of 119 Hotel Street spoke during public comment, urging the board to ensure the fence would not impede access from an adjacent carport. Bates said the pathway is tight and that, if a fence reduced clearance, he might not be able to open vehicle doors or move trash cans; he asked the board to preserve access.
Michael Hill of the planning department advised that city code generally allows a six-foot fence so long as it does not extend past the home's front façade and recommended applicants provide a property survey to resolve boundary questions. The board conditioned approval on substituting wood (not fiberglass) where appropriate, allowing metal fencing in certain sections, and verifying property lines with city staff. A motion to approve with those conditions passed.
The board recorded that final placement and any required changes will be finalized with planning staff during building-permit review.
