Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners send revised grants policy back to staff over expedited-approval language
Summary
After a lengthy discussion about expedited grant approvals and the board’s role in accepting awards, the commission voted 10–0 to return the proposed GRAMA grant-application policy to administration to address nonmatching requirements, personnel implications and alignment with the strategic plan.
Commissioner Davis moved Aug. 6 to send the revised GRAMA grant-application policy back to administration and human services for further work on three items: nonmatching requirements, personnel obligations and adherence to the commission’s strategic plan. The motion was seconded and carried 10–0 on roll call.
Davis said she preferred that the commission "play the role of accepting the grant after it has been approved and allow staff to do the role of applying for the grants," explaining that giving staff authority to apply expediently would speed up opportunities without surrendering final acceptance authority. Interim County Administrator Allen House and CFO Shelley Knieven explained that the disputed section (3.c) codifies a practice used for short-notice federal and other large grants and that the policy was intended to preserve audit controls while allowing retroactive committee notification when quick action is needed.
Legal counsel and staff noted that federal funders and auditors require controls and documentation; administration suggested the draft be adjusted to include thresholds and clearer language about where matches and personnel commitments require prior commission approval. After discussion the board directed staff to revise the policy to reflect those points and return with clarified language and parameters.
