Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Beacon council refers Fishkill Creek District hotel and density changes to planning boards
Summary
The Beacon City Council voted to refer proposed zoning changes for the Fishkill Creek District—including expressly permitting hotels and removing a dwelling-unit density cap—to the city and Dutchess County planning boards for review and a future public hearing. Staff and council debated setbacks, hotel amenities and whether hotels could substitute for short-term rentals.
The City of Beacon’s council referred a proposed local law that would amend the Fishkill Creek District (FCD) zoning to the City of Beacon and Dutchess County planning boards for review and for scheduling of a public hearing.
Natalie, the staff presenter, summarized the two main policy changes under consideration: "one is to expressly permit hotels, and the other is to eliminate the density regulations and allow the other form-based kind of code regulations to instead dictate how tall a building can be and what its massing can be," she said. The proposed redlined local law would change the FCD use table to make hotels a permitted use (or, optionally, a special-permit use) and would remove the district’s explicit maximum dwelling-unit density so that form-based massing rules regulate building scale.
Council members and staff discussed several details staff will ask the planning boards to review, including minimum setbacks measured from the top of the creek bank, the FCD’s supplemental hotel regulations (lobby and on-site manager requirements, off-street parking references), and how to ensure new development provides community benefits (for example, bike parking and public restrooms near Madame Brett Park). Council member Krasikoff noted local differences in hotel pricing and urged caution about assuming hotels will be a substitute for short-term rentals; another member asked for clearer language measuring setbacks from the "top of the creek bank."
The council clarified that referral is not adoption: Chair stated the council would return to the matter after planning-board feedback. The resolution to refer the local law passed on the council floor; no individual roll-call tallies were recorded in the transcript beyond the chair calling for "Aye" and no objections being voiced on the record.
The planning boards were asked to pay particular attention to creek setbacks, bulk/massing concerns, and the implications of removing the density cap before the council schedules a public hearing.
