Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Tax Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Palmdale council defers remainder of Measure PD tax increases to 2035–2036, asks staff to study full repeal

Palmdale City Council · August 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council voted unanimously to delay the remaining 0.5 percentage points of Measure PD (sales tax) implementation — 0.25% to take effect 01/01/2035 and 0.25% on 01/01/2036 — and directed staff and the city attorney to prepare a financial analysis of a full repeal and costs/timelines for placing repeal on a ballot.

Deputy City Manager Janelle Sampson presented a resolution to defer the phased implementation of the remaining 0.5% of Measure PD. Sampson said the city had coordinated with the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA) and proposed deferring 0.25 percentage point to take effect Jan. 1, 2035, and the remaining 0.25 point to Jan. 1, 2036. The item prompted substantial council debate about whether to repeal the measure entirely or postpone its implementation.

Council members and many members of the public argued strongly on both sides. Several speakers called the deferral insufficient and urged a full repeal or a ballot referendum; others urged deferral to relieve current economic pressure. After extended discussion and public comment, the council unanimously adopted the resolution to defer the remaining Measure PD implementation while simultaneously directing staff and the city attorney to produce a fiscal analysis of a full repeal and to estimate costs and timelines to place a repeal on a special or primary ballot.

"Delaying a tax increase is not tax relief," one speaker told the council; another urged the council to take the repeal to voters. City staff said the deferral approach is permitted by CDTFA and that future councils could further delay implementation by subsequent resolution. Council also requested staff to include the budgetary impacts and options to replace any revenue if repeal were pursued.