Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Media Coverage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Witness alleges 60 Minutes interview about banks and Epstein was shelved and ties suppression to media shifts
Summary
An unnamed witness said 60 Minutes interviewed them in March about a report alleging big banks enabled Epstein trafficking, that CBS never aired the segment and later fired the reporter, and that a "far right media buyout" is aiding political efforts to keep the material quiet. The transcript records no response from CBS or financial institutions.
A witness told the meeting that "In March, 60 Minutes interviewed me on my report going into how the big banks enabled Epstein *** trafficking," and said the segment was not aired. The witness characterized the sequence of events as suppression of reporting and linked it to later personnel changes at the network.
The witness further said, "CBS never aired the interview," and added that a few months later CBS fired the reporter who conducted the piece. They alleged the problem was part of broader media consolidation, stating, "The far right media buyout is helping Trump who doesn't want any of this information to get out." The transcript contains no recorded response from CBS, the reporter, the banks named in the allegation, or any other party, and it does not establish corroboration or evidence beyond the witness's statements.
The remarks in the transcript are presented as allegations by the witness rather than proven facts. The witness did not give a full date for the later personnel action beyond saying it occurred "a few months later," and the year for the March interview is not specified in the record. The transcript also does not include supporting documents or follow-up testimony in the available segments.
No motions, votes, or formal actions were recorded in the transcript excerpts provided. The record shows the witness's account and allegations but does not contain cross-examination, documentary evidence, or responses from the named institutions; further reporting would be required to verify the claims.
