Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the City Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City reviewer says Sherrill's operating reserves improved despite large OPEB liability
Summary
An independent reviewer told the Sherrill City Commission the general fund rose by about $188,000 (roughly 6%), sewer and electric funds remain solvent, but government‑wide accounting shows a roughly $6 million deficit driven by OPEB liabilities.
An external financial reviewer presented the Sherrill City Commission with 2025 financial statements and told commissioners the city’s general fund increased by about $188,000, roughly 6% compared with the prior year.
Len Carismo, who identified himself as the person conducting the annual review ("it's not an audit"), walked the commission through the report and highlighted fund balances, long‑term liabilities and the rationale behind the accounting figures. "So that that's a 6% increase overall," Carismo said while describing the general fund movement and later cautioned the commission that the government‑wide statements reflect long‑term obligations.
Carismo said the city’s cash position in the general fund is about $3.3 million and that the sewer fund holds roughly $906,000, both described as healthy given recent budgets. He explained the capital fund shows a temporary deficit because short‑term bond anticipation financing was used for planned purchases — including a $157,000 rescue truck, a $118,000 dump truck and roughly $280,000 in court improvements.
At the government‑wide level, Carismo said a net Other Post‑Employment Benefit (OPEB) liability of about $5.6 million produces an accounting deficit of about $6 million; he noted there is no legal mechanism in New York state to pre‑fund that obligation. He characterized the city's overall debt at about 3.7% of the constitutional limit and called the city's financial position "very healthy" in operational terms.
The reviewer also flagged timing effects: grant timing and one‑time route‑project spending had driven prior‑year variances. Commissioners did not ask to table the report; the review will be included in the city’s records for FY2025.
