Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates conditional‑use rules for manufactured homes, cites fairness concerns
Summary
Commissioners and Planning & Zoning members said the county's conditional‑use language applies more broadly than intended to manufactured homes; commissioners paused to avoid perceived inconsistent exceptions after a resident said she had already purchased a home.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County officials and Planning & Zoning members spent a work session reviewing how the county’s conditional‑use permit (CUP) rules apply to manufactured homes and substandard lots, and several commissioners said they were mindful of legal risk if exceptions were granted inconsistently.
Planning & Zoning Chairman Brent Ingersoll told commissioners the CUP language had the unintended effect of applying to both manufactured and stick‑built homes in some cases. Commissioners discussed whether to approve several applications immediately; Chairman Charles Coffey cautioned against ad hoc exceptions, saying, "If we give you an exception, then that opens us up that we didn't do the same for someone else." The commission voted down a motion to approve three CUPs at the work session because of those fairness concerns and later scheduled a called meeting to decide the items.
Applicants and planning staff discussed procedural details, including whether signs notifying neighbors were posted within the required 15‑ to 45‑day window and whether septic tests had been completed. Planning & Zoning members and the county attorney said the board must be mindful of state zoning procedures and the difference between what the ordinance as written requires and what the board originally intended.
County Manager Thomas Weaver and staff said approvals granted at the called meeting would still be subject to plat signing, health‑department and building permits. Commissioners asked planning staff to propose clearer ordinance language to avoid confusion going forward.
