Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Land Use Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bay Village planning commission opens hearing on 28727 Wolf Road; motion made with documentation conditions

City of Bay Village Planning Commission · June 17, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission opened a public hearing June 17 on an application for 28727 Wolf Road. Commissioners asked that final materials, a photometric lighting plan, and a tree preservation plan be submitted before any building permit; a motion to approve was made in the meeting but no vote is recorded in the transcript.

The Bay Village Planning Commission opened a public hearing on an application for 28727 Wolf Road on June 17 and discussed conditions commissioners want attached to any approval.

Chair (S1) told the room the commission would require documentation that reconciles Architectural Board of Review decisions with the permit submission and listed three items to be included in a motion: "documentation of the materials, photometrics on the lighting, [and] tree preservation plan moving forward." The applicant (S6) said the team would "expedite getting those in, so those would be in before we make any submissions to the building department." The transcript records a commission member making a motion to approve, but does not record a second or a roll-call vote on that motion.

Commissioners stressed the importance of reconciling final elevations and materials with ABR comments before permits are issued and that the city inspector should have both the approved packet and the applicant's construction documents for comparison. The transcript includes multiple requests that photometric plans demonstrate zero on-site light bleed and full cut-off fixtures because of adjacent residential properties.

Public speakers raised questions about circulation, fence placement and construction fencing blocking sight lines; the applicant agreed to address construction-fence placement with the contractor. The city staff and applicant agreed the front-yard fence height will require a variance to the Board of Zoning Appeals before any final permit can proceed.

What happens next: the transcript shows the applicant intends to prepare and submit required documents and the variance paperwork; the meeting ended with plans to place the variance on an upcoming agenda. The transcript does not record a formal approval vote.