Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Host Community Agreement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee discusses community benefits, host agreements and tax limits for battery projects
Summary
Members explored host community agreements, whether the town can require community benefits, and state limitations on using TIF funds; staff said taxation and negotiated community benefits are separate from the zoning bylaw but can be encouraged in host agreements.
Committee members asked whether the ordinance should address tax or host-community benefit terms. Kurt said tax structures are typically negotiated and are separate from zoning language, but the ordinance can and should require disclosure of proposed benefits as part of an application package so the town can evaluate community offers.
Mark noted the town's existing TIF statute does not allow TIF funds to be used for recreational buildings and said the town intends to work with its legislative delegation if it wants to expand allowable uses. "Our current TIF statute for the state doesn't allow TIFs to be used for, recreational buildings," he said, and added the town may pursue legislative changes if it wants to direct revenue toward specific projects.
The clinic said it could present common host-community provisions—local hiring preferences for civil work, fire-equipment upgrades, or contributions to schools—and suggested including a prompt in the application to outline any proposed community benefits. Committee members favored voluntary offers over mandatory financial conditions in ordinance language, consistent with the town attorney's view that some demands may exceed the municipality's legal authority.
Next steps: clinic to research typical host-community agreements and propose language that allows the committee to consider voluntary benefits in permitting decisions.
