Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
VML Bank outlines financing options as Nottoway weighs courthouse project
Summary
A VML Bank of Finance representative told supervisors that courthouse projects in Virginia commonly use IDA conduit financing, lease-revenue bonds with a moral/appropriation pledge, interim construction loans and the VRA pooled bond program, and offered a $7,000 planning grant toward a plan-of-finance.
A representative of VML Bank of Finance explained to the Nottoway County Board of Supervisors that the county has several financing routes to consider for a possible courthouse renovation or replacement, and that each option carries different timelines and cost implications. The presenter said counties often use an IDA as a conduit issuer and structure tax-exempt lease-revenue bonds with an appropriation pledge — a so-called moral obligation — or participate in the Virginia Resources Authority pooled bond program.
The presenter emphasized planning and transparency: the bank would prepare a plan of finance, including a five-year projection and a recommendation on whether to use cash, bond financing or bank loans. "We start out with, developing a 5 year projection of revenues, expenses, and fund balance," the VML Bank representative said, describing the process. He cited recent comparables the firm worked on, including a $31,000,000 Botetourt County financing and a $27,000,000 Lexington/Rockbridge courthouse financing that used pooled or standalone structures. The presenter also said the nonprofit arm can provide a $7,000 grant to help offset roughly 45% of the cost for preparing a plan of finance.
Board members probed timing and risks: supervisors asked whether a general-obligation bond would require a referendum and the presenter confirmed counties typically face a yearlong public process to pursue general-obligation financing. He also described interim construction financing options and said, depending on project size, a bank placement or municipal bond sale could be the most cost-effective approach. The board did not take formal action at the work session but said it will continue evaluating proposals and the PPEA responses the county has received.
