Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pensions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
TCDRS official briefs Hutchinson County on retirement plan choices, funding and COLA options
Summary
Richard Ashcraft of the Texas County & District Retirement System told commissioners their plan is nearly fully funded, explained required vs. elected rates and outlined options for employer-match increases and cost-of-living adjustments; commissioners asked for fiscal scenarios.
Richard Ashcraft, an account manager with the Texas County & District Retirement System (TCDRS), presented to the Hutchinson County commissioners on the county’s retirement plan and funding options. Ashcraft described the system as a savings-based retirement plan serving counties and districts, and he identified the county’s existing parameters: employees contribute 7% (the statutory maximum), and the county’s elected employer rate has been above the requirement for years as a prefunding strategy.
Ashcraft provided the key actuarial and plan figures for 2027: the required contribution rate was presented as 7.77% of payroll while Hutchinson County’s elected rate is 11.55% (an elected rate that the county has used for several years to prefund benefits). He told the commissioners the plan’s current funding ratio is near 98.1% and outlined vesting and eligibility rules, including the “75 rule” (age plus years of service) and a 30-year service eligibility option.
On benefit changes, Ashcraft explained options for cost-of-living adjustments (flat-rate COLAs versus CPI-based adjustments) and the mechanics of changing employer-match levels either future-forward or retroactively. He said the county could choose a higher employer match (for example, moving toward a 200% match) and that staff could run scenarios for both future-forward and past-and-future (retroactive) implementations. "If you decide to make it retroactive... their entire account balance would be matched at 200%," Ashcraft said in the presentation.
Commissioners asked for modeling on the fiscal impact of proposed changes; Ashcraft confirmed there is time to make plan-change elections before the December deadline for plan-year implementation. The commissioners did not enact any immediate plan changes at the meeting but requested written scenarios showing the budget impact of different match and COLA options.
Speakers quoted: Richard Ashcraft (TCDRS) and county budget staff (S3) provided figures and answered commissioners' procedural questions. The county asked staff to provide financial comparisons before any vote on plan changes.
