Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Dock And Moorings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Dock, mooring applications move forward; scientists and neighbors press for less-toxic materials and retractable steps
Summary
The board opened multiple public hearings and later approved several mooring permits. Environmental advisers urged against CCA-treated pilings and recommended retractable stairs and no lighting for proposed docks; applicants said DEC permits were issued and argued for parity with prior approvals.
Get email alerts on the Dock And Moorings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Shelter Island Town Board opened and considered a suite of mooring and dock applications and later approved several mooring permits after the Water Management Advisory Committee recommended approval for most items.
During a public hearing on a dock proposed by Robert Fagan in Dickerson Creek, town environmental consultant Theresa Mason recommended against using CCA-treated stringers and pilings because chemicals can leach into sediments and harm benthic life, and she advised retractable end steps and avoidance of lighting that could disturb marine circadian rhythms. "We recommend against doing so because those chemicals can leach into the environment...and cause adverse impacts to benthic life," Mason said.
Applicant Robert Fagan replied that his application had DEC approval and that comparable docks recently approved by the town reached similar or greater depth, arguing for equal treatment. He told the board, "DEC issued a permit...I have cleared every legal and environmental lehi this process requires." Several neighbors and at least one supporter said the dock was modest and necessary to restore riparian access.
Separately, the board took action to authorize the town clerk to issue mooring permits for multiple applicants after public hearings and WMAC reports indicating votes typically 5–0 or 6–0 in favor. The board said it will consolidate the routine mooring approvals that had no substantive opposition later in the meeting so residents seeking seasonal access can receive permits before the boating season.
