Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Devices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears first reading of state-mandated bell-to-bell device ban (Policy 55-16)
Summary
The superintendent presented Policy 55-16 and Regulation 55-16 (first reading) to implement a state-required K–12 ban on internet-enabled device use during the school day, outlined accommodations and enforcement steps, and scheduled a second reading for Aug. 31.
Get email alerts on the Student Devices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Superintendent Mark Daniels presented the first reading of Policy 55-16 and corresponding Regulation 55-16, required by legislation signed in January 2026, and summarized the district's recommended implementation.
"Students shall be permitted to use these devices on their way to school and on their way home," Daniels said, describing that the core K–12 provision bars internet-enabled devices during the school day ("bell to bell") while allowing use on buses, before/after school and at supervised, school-sponsored events. He said the district recommends students keep phones and other internet-enabled devices turned off and stored in backpacks, lockers or other bags during the instructional day rather than using locked pouches.
Daniels explained accommodation pathways for IEPs, 504 plans or health needs and a process for superintendent/principal authorization when there is "no reasonable alternative." He described a progressive enforcement scheme in the regulation: teacher/administrator retention for the day with parent notification on a first violation; parent pickup and signed acknowledgement on a second; escalating consequences on later incidents, up to detention or suspension in severe cases. Daniels said the policy will return for a second reading on Aug. 31.
Board members questioned why high school students could not have phones at lunch; one member said, "I struggle with why in 9 through 12, you can't have your phone at lunch." Daniels replied that the legislation's bell-to-bell language limits flexibility and that the intent is to reduce distraction and promote in-person interaction, while acknowledging the need for transition supports and counselor involvement. Several board members urged communication plans for families and suggested providing low-tech alternatives for student social time during the adjustment period.

