Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Naming Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Kalispell council reviews proposed naming policy for parks and public assets
Summary
City staff presented a draft naming policy that prioritizes geographic and historical names and requires council approval for most namings; councilors debated whether small commemorative items (benches, plaques) should be approved administratively or come before council.
Get email alerts on the Naming Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council President Kyle Waterman opened the Aug. 10 work session and asked staff to present a proposed naming policy for city-owned parks, trails, buildings and other public assets. Donnie, identified in the packet as a Planner, told the council the policy aims to create a consistent process "while reflecting Kalispell's identity, history, and geographic character." The draft ranks naming preference into four categories: geographic features; historical and cultural significance; functional or descriptive names; and individuals or organizations with significant, lasting contributions.
Council members asked how sponsorships and small commemorative items would be handled. Staff said the draft prohibits commercial naming unless the council approves a formal agreement. Councilor Fisher urged the council to allow staff to administratively approve small items such as benches or plaques below a monetary threshold; he suggested "a $500 threshold" as a starting point to avoid delaying routine acknowledgments. Other councilors said they favored items coming to the council initially and then reconsidering administrative delegation if demand grows.
Several council members also cautioned about naming facilities after people. One said that while honoring donors and volunteers is valuable, names tied to individuals can become problematic if new information later emerges; staff said the policy sets a higher standard for renaming to protect established community identities. Donnie told the council the policy would return for formal consideration and that the council would approve it by resolution if it chooses to adopt it.
What happens next: staff asked for council feedback and will bring a revised draft to a future meeting that could be noticed as a resolution for council action.

