Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Civic Engagement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents, developer and farmland coalition weigh in on growth, incentives and solar project intervention
Summary
Public commenters addressed tax-incentive transparency and development patterns; developer Clay Chester defended TIFs as growth drivers and Joshua Trapp thanked the commissioners for intervening in the Sloopy Solar Project decision.
During public comments at the July 15 meeting, residents and local stakeholders raised questions about transparency in economic incentives, the county’s role in development and a recent state-level decision about a solar project.
Diana Daniels of Springfield Township asked whether legal counsel retained for tax-increment financing would address concerns about lengthy abatements; she said she and others are "dissatisfied and disappointed in watching the treasury be given away to the tune of 15 years 100% tax abatements for businesses." County Administrator Jennifer Hutchinson responded, "I can say that the invoices will not be paid by the county, they will be paid by the developer."
Clay Chester of Premier Properties described recent acceleration in residential development and said tax incentives have been "key drivers" enabling projects that otherwise would not proceed, helping workforce and retail expansion. Joshua Trapp, a founding member of the Harmony Farmland Preservation Coalition, told the board that "21 days ago the OPSB voted against the Sloopy Solar Project" and thanked commissioners and staff for intervening in the matter on behalf of farmland preservation.
