Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Building Height topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners weigh raising RM height limits for denser mixed-use development
Summary
The commission debated whether RM (residential mixed) maximum height should remain at 40 feet (about four stories) or be increased — commissioners cited wind and snow engineering constraints in small towns and asked consultants to test higher limits for future flexibility.
Commissioner (S2) asked why the RM maximum is set at 40 feet and whether a taller limit might be appropriate for future community-scale buildings. The group discussed that 40 feet equates roughly to four stories with 10-foot floor heights; S5 observed, "40 feet would be 4 stores."
Participants raised practical constraints: wind and snow loads in mountain towns like McLeod and McCloud may limit feasible height unless engineering and building-department sign-offs are secured. Several commissioners suggested allowing flexibility (e.g., 50–60 feet) but relying on consultants and the county building department to provide technical guidance and variance paths. Staff (S1) agreed to bring consultant advice back to the commission; there was no formal vote.
