Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Cottage Food topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commissioners favor administrative review for cottage food operations, stress environmental-health checks
Summary
Siskiyou County planning commissioners recommended handling cottage food operations and small commercial kitchens as administrative use permits (AUPs) with environmental-health review for higher-risk processing, while reserving full use permits for plant-scale food processing.
Commissioner Fell said the state cottage food law already allows small-scale food sales and asked whether the county should treat those operations administratively. "For clarification on this 1, that the cottage food law is signed by the state several years ago," he said, arguing the county can streamline permitting for small producers.
Staff replied that environmental health would continue to review any operation that bottles or jars products or otherwise requires commercial kitchen standards. "Environmental health would still look at it," staff said, distinguishing cottage-scale activity from plant-scale food processing and noting the county’s role is primarily zoning oversight.
The commission discussed commercial kitchens and community kitchens as distinct from large processing plants: commissioners supported AUPs for cottage-scale operations in RR, RL and RM, with the director able to escalate to a full use permit if scale or public-health risk required it. One commissioner noted, "If QVIR wanted to build a community kitchen... I would not want to deny your ability to do that."
Why it matters: treating cottage food and small community kitchens as AUPs reduces procedural burden for small entrepreneurs while keeping environmental-health safeguards in place for any activity that approaches commercial-plant scale. The commission directed staff to keep the cottage-food AUP language and clarify thresholds that would trigger environmental-health or UP review.
