Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Marble Falls zoning board unanimously grants variance for 1300 Lantana Drive (Case No. 2025-47-ZV)
Summary
The Zoning Board of Adjustment granted a variance to Section 4.3.1 for 1300 Lantana Drive (Case No. 2025-47-ZV), after staff presentation and testimony from the applicant; the motion passed 4-0. The board cited traffic, stacking and employee-welfare concerns raised during the hearing.
The Marble Falls Zoning Board of Adjustment on Sept. 17 unanimously approved a zoning variance for property municipally addressed as 1300 Lantana Drive (Case No. 2025-47-ZV), finding the request met the criteria required for a variance.
Scarlet Moreno, Director of Development Services, introduced the public hearing and the variance application to Section 4.3.1 (Nonresidential and Mixed-Use Lot and Building Standards) for the General Commercial zoning district. Applicant and owner Austin Moon addressed the board and raised "stacking concerns, traffic issues, and weather concerns." Chairman Steve Hurst opened the public hearing at 12:20 pm; with no public comments, he closed the hearing at 12:21 pm.
Board members discussed traffic and safety implications, stacking on-site, and employee welfare. Vice-Chairman Brett Carter moved to go through the conditions required for a variance and Board Member Thomas Oostermeyer seconded; the board agreed the case met all variance criteria and the motion to grant the variance carried by a 4-0 vote. The transcript records the motion as passed 4-0 but does not identify individual seconders for the earlier officer-appointment motions.
The action amends the applicable street-side setback requirement for the property at 1300 Lantana Drive. The board did not attach any additional conditions to the variance in the recorded motion. The meeting record shows the vote tally as 4-0 in favor; the transcript does not provide a roll-call naming each member's individual vote, but four board members were present and the recorded outcome was unanimous.
The variance was considered under local zoning code standards (Section 4.3.1) and is recorded as Case No. 2025-47-ZV. The board adjourned at 12:35 pm.
