Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Wood Processing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners propose allowing portable wood-processing on ag parcels, tighten rules for permanent mills
Summary
Siskiyou County commissioners recommended distinguishing portable, temporary wood-processing (to be allowed on AG2 and TPZ by right) from permanent wood-processing facilities (which would require higher review), aiming to protect small-scale firewood and on-farm sawmilling while keeping industrial operations under permit.
Get email alerts on the Wood Processing topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Siskiyou County planning commissioners debated where to draw the line between small, on‑site sawmilling and permanent wood‑processing facilities, ultimately proposing that portable wood‑processing be allowed by right in AG2 and Timber Production Zone (TPZ) but require an Administrative Use Permit (AUP) or similar review in AG1.
"We made a note for the Timberwood Processing Facility. We were gonna do that as a UP," said Committee member (S2), noting the draft will be sent to the county's consultant. Commissioners emphasized that portable, nonpermanent mills — the kind that move onto a parcel for seasonal work — differ from a permanent manufacturing plant making dimensional lumber and should not be treated as industrial uses when accessory to a farm operation.
Members raised concerns that a broad "processing" label could unintentionally capture routine activities such as splitting firewood or small‑scale direct sales. Committee member (S3) said a clear portable‑vs‑permanent definition would allow small operators to earn revenue from timberland without being pushed into industrial zoning rules. Staff (Staff member (S1)) agreed to ask the consultant to refine definitions so that permanent mills with structures and continuous wholesale sales are handled differently than short‑term or direct‑to‑consumer operations.
The discussion included related accessory uses such as on‑site fabrication and mobile equipment; commissioners proposed AUP for AG1 and by‑right status for AG2/TPZ where appropriate. No formal action was taken; staff will forward the revised language to the consultant for incorporation and return to the commission for review.
