Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transgender Student Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Winthrop community sharply divided as board revisits transgender-student policy
Summary
Hundreds of public comments and board debate focused on a March 4 directive to revise district policy JB on transgender students; students, parents and residents offered sharply opposing views about fairness, safety and legal risk.
The Winthrop School Board heard more than a dozen speakers for and against a March 4 directive to the superintendent to revise policy JB, which governs access to facilities and athletic teams for transgender students.
Whitney Khan, who identified herself as a Winthrop parent, urged the board to rescind the March 4 directive and to follow the district's policy adoption procedures, saying the motion "conflicts with Maine law" and that the district's legal counsel and administrators had advised caution. "Facts were not presented," Khan told the board and handed out guidance from the American Medical Association and American Psychological Association.
Students and other residents spoke on both sides. Sophie Schumann, a sophomore multi-sport athlete, told the board: "I believe it's important to protect fairness and safety in girls sports," adding that separate girls' teams exist to ensure equal opportunities. By contrast, John Ellis, a Winthrop resident and trans man who said he was a former student, urged inclusion and pushed back on safety claims: "Trans girls are not boys…They deserve that same support I had rather than alienation at the hands of the school board."
Administrators who were asked to present said current facilities provide private, single-use restrooms and changing spaces. Theresa Violet, elementary principal, and the middle- and high-school principals described multiple single-use bathrooms and private changing options, and said they have accommodated transgender students previously without incident.
Board members, however, expressed sharp disagreement about procedure and legal exposure. Several members said legal advice at an earlier executive session showed conflicting obligations between the Maine Human Rights Act and federal Title IX; one member described the board as being placed in an "impossible situation." Another member defended the March 4 vote as legally permissible and argued the board's duty includes protecting girls' spaces.
The meeting featured repeated appeals that the board follow established policy-review procedures and avoid creating a problem where administrators say none exists. "We have not had transgender athletes in our district in the last 12 years," one athletic director said during the administrative update, a point several public speakers cited in arguing for a pause.
The board did not adopt a change to Policy JB during the meeting; members directed the policy committee to continue work and to prepare draft language for further board consideration on a near-term schedule.
