Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transgender Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents, teachers urge Winthrop School Board to halt proposed transgender-sports ban, warn of legal and staffing risks
Summary
Multiple teachers, students and residents urged the Winthrop School Board to pause or rescind proposed changes to policy JB that would bar transgender females from girls' sports, saying the policy risks violating Title IX and the Maine Human Rights Act and could expose the district to lawsuits and staffing losses.
Several community members urged the Winthrop School Board to stop pursuing a proposed policy that would bar transgender females from playing on girls' sports teams, saying the board "rushed to pass a policy" and has not adequately considered legal and staffing consequences.
"What I observed was the behavior of 3 members trying to voice their belief system on others by creating a nonexistent problem," said Elizabeth Peters, building representative for the Winthrop Education Association and an ELA teacher at Winthrop Middle School. Peters told the board she was speaking for multiple staff and community members and said the policy would "choose a tiny population of people to discriminate against." (S2)
Whitney Khan, a Winthrop resident, pressed the board for a financial and legal accounting tied to the change, citing a shared legal-insurance cap and past case law. "What is your estimate of the cost to defend an MHRC lawsuit and what line item in the budget currently covers it?" Khan asked, referencing a $250,000 collective legal-insurance cap the superintendent previously discussed and the 2014 Doe v. RSU 26 decision that imposed a $75,000 penalty on a district for violating the Maine Human Rights Act.
Community speakers warned that pursuing the policy could drive staff away. Peters said middle-school staff are "actively seeking other employment because they don't feel comfortable representing…a hateful school board policy," and urged the board to wait until after November elections before any final action so the district does not risk litigation or reputational harm. Beth Durocher, a parent, similarly urged the board to "go back to the important work" of stewardship of time and resources and asked the board to bring a motion to rescind the contentious proposal. (S6)
The speakers framed their objections as legal and fiscal risks rather than purely political disagreement. The board did not take final action on policy JB during the meeting; public commenters asked the board to supply analyses of insurance coverage, potential liabilities and budgeted legal expenses before moving forward.
