Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Farley Building Security topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Select Board hears $40,000 estimate to protect Farley Building with temporary wireless alarm

Hollis Select Board · August 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Fire chief presented a modular wireless alarm option (WES‑3) for the unoccupied Farley Building, estimated near $40,000 including cellular upgrade; board discussed funding sources and opted to research financing before taking action.

Fire Chief (S14) updated the board Aug. 10 on options to protect the unoccupied Farley Building and presented a recommendation for a modular, battery‑operated wireless alarm system (WES‑3) used on construction sites and in other mothballed buildings.

The chief said the system is modular, battery‑powered with roughly a three‑year battery life and can be reprogrammed and moved. He noted the building’s existing cellular communicator is a 24‑volt device and the WES‑3 requires upgrading to a 120‑volt cellular packet, which in practice would require leaving power on in the building and adding a cellular transmission unit. After a site walk‑through with the contractor and fire inspector, the contractor estimated the work “right around $40,000” and the chief said he believed the price should not exceed that amount.

Board members raised questions about RFP procedures for a project of that dollar amount, whether the town could use a preferred vendor list, the lifespan and maintainability of the devices, and possible funding sources such as the municipal building trust fund. The chief recommended the town use a known vendor experienced with these systems; staff reported the company is on the town’s preferred‑vendor list but said writing an RFP for a nonstandard, unoccupied building could produce widely varying bids.

No vote was taken; the board asked staff to identify funding sources and return with clarified costs and options before approving the work.