Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the 410 South High Street Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners, applicant debate materials, facades and setbacks for South High Street project
Summary
Commissioners pressed the applicant about facade treatment, window patterns and setbacks for Block 1 of the 410 South High Street project; the applicant defended replacing board‑and‑batten with standing‑seam metal and said facades on Price and Dean streets are designed to be refined and contextual.
Get email alerts on the 410 South High Street Design topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners spent substantial time asking for clearer context and explaining why certain elevations and facade elements matter for the borough's historic character. One commissioner urged the applicant to include adjacent buildings in the elevation package so the commission can better assess scale and visual impact; another noted that Dean and Price street facades read as primary street elevations and asked why bay windows were not employed on those faces.
The applicant read a written response defending the design choices and the revised materials package. "We agree with Carl Quigley's assessment of the original board and batten material, and we've revised the 4th Floor cladding to a light gray standing seam metal panel," the applicant stated when reading the response into the record, adding that the change is supported by the design guidelines and intended to distinguish the upper floor while remaining within the historical material palette. Commissioners voiced mixed views about setbacks (town center zero‑setback vs. HARP guidance to follow adjacent lots) and requested clearer renderings showing neighboring storefronts for context before final action.

