Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Debt Service topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Staff modeling shows planned borrowing above $25M guideline, warns of higher near-term debt service

Nashua Board of Aldermen Capital Planning Committee · August 10, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City finance staff showed debt-service projections that push the five-year average above the $25 million target — about $39 million in the presented plan — and explained that years 2–5 will see higher year-over-year increases as older debt rolls remain in place.

City finance staff told the capital planning committee that the "planned" schedule in front of members currently averages about $39,000,000 over five years, higher than the committee's $25,000,000 annual target with inflation. Don Enright, the city CFO, walked the committee through spreadsheets showing the target ($25,000,000 starting in 2025 plus a 5% inflation factor) and the planned schedule that results from including additional authorized and proposed projects. "The target is what was agreed upon in this committee of the 25,000,000 with a ... 5 percent inflationary year over year," Enright said while explaining how the planned schedule compares.

Enright and other members emphasized that the early years of the schedule show greater percentage increases (years 2–5) because legacy borrowings still require payments while new debt comes on line; later years return closer to the target as older debt matures. Committee members asked specifically how the additional debt service might affect tax rates; staff offered a ballpark: if $25,000,000 is issued at roughly 4% interest, interest could be on the order of $1,000,000 annually, which committee members estimated would translate into a change of a few tenths of a percentage point on the tax rate depending on other budget choices and debt retirements. Staff committed to produce clearer inflation‑adjusted figures and an explicit percent‑of‑tax‑rate equivalence for the full Board of Aldermen.