Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Boards Commissions topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bastrop council advances ordinance adding two ex‑officio parks board seats to second reading

City Council of Bastrop, Texas · November 19, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The council approved moving Ordinance No. 2025‑82 to a Dec. 9 second reading to add two ex‑officio parks board positions; debate centered on whether county nomination (commissioners court) should be required or a county‑affiliated nonprofit representative may fill the slot.

The Bastrop City Council voted on Nov. 18 to move Ordinance No. 2025‑82, an amendment to the city code to add two ex‑officio positions to the Parks Board, to a second reading on Dec. 9, 2025.

Council Member Foster argued the language should allow a representative from the Friends of Bastrop County Parks and Open Spaces — a 501(c)(3) distinct from the county that has been active in county park efforts — rather than strictly requiring a nomination from the Bastrop commissioners court. "I would like to make a recommendation for us to change our language, so that we can include someone from the Friends of Bastrop County Parks and Open Spaces board, and not necessarily the Bastrop County board," Foster said during discussion. City Manager staff and other council members noted the current draft calls for a county parks representative and that the commissioners court could designate a nominee.

Supporters of requiring a formal county nomination said the extra step lends credibility because the commissioners court would have taken official action; critics called that process an unnecessary hurdle for a non‑voting liaison role. After discussion the council approved forwarding the ordinance to the Dec. 9 agenda for a second reading. No formal amendment was adopted at this meeting.

The ordinance text (No. 2025‑82) was read on the record and will return for a formal second reading and final vote. The measure was described as procedural and intended to enhance coordination between city and county park planning while preserving the parks board's existing seat structure.

The council approved the motion on a voice vote.