Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Markers topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission members raise concerns about oversized SC250 plaque at Saint Philip's Church; staff proposes permitting fixes
Summary
Commission members said a large SC250 plaque placed near the curb at Saint Philip's Church "slipped through the cracks" of city review after it was moved from private property into the public right-of-way; staff proposed adding a DRC/permitting checkbox and routing change to ensure History Commission review going forward.
Commission members reviewed a recently installed SC250 plaque at Saint Philip's Church and questioned its size and placement, saying the marker is highly prominent and risks setting a precedent for public-right-of-way signage. A commission member said the plaque feels "in your face," and another described it bluntly as "gargantuan."
Edmund Most, the city's intern section chief for capital projects and facilities, told the commission the marker had been fabricated and placed on private property but later moved toward the public right-of-way, which is when it fell outside the Commission's normal review path. "It was when it was moved from the private property to public realm is when it didn't fit in our process then," Most said, explaining why the Design Review Committee (DRC) and History Commission did not review the final installed location.
Members pressed on whether the plaque's scale and wording were appropriate for a public thoroughfare and noted that precedent matters: similar large markers visible from sidewalks could prompt copycat installations if not reviewed. Staff proposed two administrative fixes to reduce future gaps: add a required checkbox in DRC/permitting intake to flag interpretive signage and explicitly route any relocation-to-right-of-way requests to the History Commission for review. The staff representative said the permitting system change is feasible and would help "minimize this from happening again in the future."
The commission agreed to schedule the Saint Philip's/SC250 plaque as an action item on the next meeting agenda so members can review location, text and set guidance for similar installations. The transcript records agreement to place the item on the next agenda; no roll-call vote or numeric tally was recorded in the transcript.
The issue arose during a regular History Commission meeting; commissioners also suggested a site visit so members can judge scale and placement in person before deciding whether the plaque must be refabricated or relocated.
