Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Driveways topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board splits on gravel driveways; asks staff to draft technical standards and grandfathering
Summary
Members debated permitting gravel or paver driveways in New Lebanon, weighing cost and environmental concerns against property values and visual standards; the board signaled no to gravel in front yards but showed openness to regulated backyard gravel pads for boats/RVs and asked staff to define specifications and grandfathering rules.
The board spent an extended portion of the meeting on parking-surface rules, debating whether homeowners must replace driveway extensions with the same material (concrete or asphalt) or whether gravel and pavers should be allowed under technical conditions.
The chair noted existing code that driveway repairs/extensions generally must match the original material: "If you have concrete, you go back with concrete. If you have asphalt, you go back with asphalt," the chair said. Several members acknowledged the high cost of paving and argued gravel or properly installed pavers could be an affordable alternative; others raised environmental and appearance concerns and urged higher standards for businesses than for residences.
The board coalesced around a few principles: continue to require matching materials for front-driveway extensions where required by existing zoning, consider technical specifications for allowed gravel/paver solutions (framed edging, a defined compacted depth such as roughly 2–3 inches base, and installation standards), and allow limited backyard gravel pads for boats, trailers and campers with defined parameters. Members also asked staff to identify properties that should be grandfathered and to draft language that distinguishes motorized RVs from nonmotorized trailers.
