Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Investments And Liabilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee considers investing $1.4M to shore up cemetery, sick‑leave and retiree liabilities
Summary
Staff proposed investing about $1.4 million in 2026 surplus to support three long‑term liabilities: Forest Cemetery perpetual care, the sick‑leave trust, and other post‑employment benefits; options ranged from very safe fixed income to limited stock funds for long‑horizon assets.
Get email alerts on the Investments And Liabilities topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City finance staff told the committee they have roughly $1.4 million in surplus revenue available and outlined options for allocating it to long‑term liabilities.
Comptroller/Treasurer Corey said the city is “pretty limited by state statute to very, very safe investment options” for most funds but noted a statutory exception for cemetery perpetual care and post‑employment benefit funds that allows a broader, prudent‑investor approach. He presented fixed‑income ladders and the option of a small stock allocation to provide dividends that can grow with inflation.
Corey laid out estimated liabilities and funding gaps: Forest Cemetery’s perpetual care fund is worth about $127,000 and generates roughly $3,200 annually against a cemetery operating budget of about $32,000 (he estimated a $613,000 add would be required to fully remove the cemetery from the tax levy). The sick‑leave trust has a year‑end balance of about $1.7 million against a discounted liability of approximately $2.5 million (a shortfall near $790,000). Other post‑employment benefits carry an actuarial liability around $2.5 million with an annual ongoing cost estimated at $100,000.
Staff noted that funding a portion of OPEB could help the city’s presentation to bond raters by reducing net liabilities disclosed in official statements. Corey recommended a cautious, staged approach rather than investing the full sum in equities at once: purchase some bonds, then ladder maturities and gradually increase diversified holdings. He also suggested that if surpluses recur the city consider transferring about $250,000 per year to address the remaining unfunded liabilities over time.
Committee members debated the tradeoffs — protecting fund‑balance strength for rating agencies versus using reserves to close gaps — and asked staff to return with more detailed allocation scenarios.

