Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents deliver petition of no confidence, press council for transparency over town-manager investigation and spending
Summary
Two residents presented a petition bearing more than 200 signatures and demanded a full accounting of the town-manager investigation, outside legal invoices and interim-management costs; they warned proposed capital projects and alleged retaliation have eroded trust.
At the Aug. 10 meeting of the Mansfield Town Council, Brian Coleman and Aaron Bowman presented a petition they said carries more than 200 signatures and called on councilors to address alleged shortcomings in transparency and personnel handling.
"The citizens have lost trust in you," Brian Coleman said, listing concerns including cost overruns on recent projects and what he described as a culture of unapproachability. Aaron Bowman detailed the petition’s specific requests and figures: he said the town has spent more than $33,000 on outside legal work related to the town-manager investigation and that the town manager remained on paid leave for roughly 17 weeks, costing taxpayers about $56,000 in salary during that period. Bowman said department heads had submitted written concerns about leave processes, keys, chain of command and potential retaliation.
Bowman urged the council to explain who received information from the investigator, why billing records show frequent contact between the investigating firm and two council leaders, and whether all nine council members were provided the same information. "Residents deserve answers," he said.
Deputy Mayor (chairing) told speakers their written materials would be collected by the town clerk and included in the next packet. Multiple councilors acknowledged the concerns and the record of letters from department heads; staff and council agreed to consider follow-up and to keep the public informed about next steps.
The petition and speakers framed their requests as seeking responsible governance and a complete public accounting of money spent and decisions made during the investigation; council discussion later that evening included scheduling executive session time and requests for staff to return with more details.
