Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Commercial Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council approves QuikTrip conditional use permit after long debate over medians and business impacts
Summary
After extended debate about frontage-road medians, safety and impacts to nearby businesses, South Weber council approved Quick Trip's conditional use permit (CUP 26-01) with conditions including removal of proposed medians and a 6-foot masonry fence on the north and east property lines.
The South Weber City Council voted March 10 to approve a conditional use permit for a new QuikTrip (CUP 26-01) with conditions that the medians proposed on the frontage road be removed and that the developer install a 6-foot masonry (precast) fence along the north and east property lines.
Braxton Key, QuikTrip real estate project manager, presented the proposal and said the company made several concessions in response to neighbor concerns: reduced pole sign height by 40 percent, reduced store square footage by 43 percent, relocated the pole sign away from the southern entrance, added 20 trees as a buffer and designated the south entrance as truck-only. "We have worked very diligently with your planning commission and with your city staff, to get to this point," Key said.
Council and residents focused substantial discussion on the frontage-road configuration and traffic controls, including whether to install raised medians that restrict left turns or use alternative striping or future roundabout placements. Staff said the proposed roadway design implements the city transportation master plan and that UDOT must approve any connection to state roads; staff also noted medians were recommended to reduce conflict points. Several council members and residents said medians could hinder large vehicles (RVs, trailers) and harm nearby businesses by rerouting traffic.
The motion to approve the CUP included the condition that medians be removed and that a 6-foot masonry fence be added along the north and east sides of the site; planning commission conditions were also incorporated. The council conducted a roll call vote; the motion carried 4–1. The approval allows the developer to pursue final site and building permits subject to the council's conditions and required administrative reviews.
Next steps: The developer must provide the masonry fence at the designated locations and implement the agreed site-plan mitigations; staff will ensure planning commission conditions remain part of the permit.
