Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Development Finance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council adopts NCA for Vernon View project after contentious hearing; TIF vote postponed
Summary
Council approved a New Community Authority (NCA) ordinance tied to the Aristovillas/Vernon View development after staff presented projected costs and revenue models. Council postponed final action on the TIF until Sept. 14 to meet statutory holding periods and address public concerns.
Mount Vernon City Council on Aug. 10 adopted a New Community Authority ordinance tied to the Aristovillas/Vernon View development after a public hearing in which staff laid out planning-level cost and revenue estimates.
Mayor Starr's presentation and city models showed an infrastructure estimate of "about 7,500,000," and staff calculated an illustrative NCA charge of roughly "$1,260 per year" per $360,000 home in a 100-home scenario. City staff and legal counsel told council the financing typically uses bonds secured by estimated future NCA and TIF revenue, and that developers bear the risk if revenues fall short. As council and staff framed it, that structure is designed so "the city is not taking money from an existing taxpayer to give it to a developer." (Mr. Collins, presenter.)
Supporters who urged using the tools to finance infrastructure said the combination of NCA and TIF could produce net revenue for the city over time; staff modeled a planning scenario that generated a surplus compared with a baseline of no incentives. Opponents argued the NCA and TIF effectively shift costs to future homeowners and asked for tighter caps and clearer buyer disclosure. Resident Don Carr urged council to reject using TIF funds inside private property lines; other residents asked for recorded disclosures so buyers see long-term NCA charges before closing.
Legal counsel and finance staff said the city will set limits, require certifications and invoices, conduct independent due diligence on developer projections and include fraud-protection language in agreements. Counsel also clarified that the city's general fund would not be pledged; staff said bonds would likely be issued by a port authority or other bond issuer rather than the city.
The council adopted the NCA ordinance (ordinance 20 26 dash 24) after votes on amendments and procedural motions. Because the TIF statute requires a post‑hearing waiting period, council postponed final action on the companion TIF ordinance until a Sept. 14 meeting to satisfy statutory notice and holding-period requirements.
