Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rpf Adaptive Management topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Concord panel advances RFP seeking adaptive management consultant for Warner's Pond
Summary
The Warner's Pond Management Committee revised a draft RFP for an adaptive management and monitoring consultant, removing numeric scoring from comparative criteria and asking responders to deliver a conceptual site model, year‑1 triggers, and monitoring plans. Committee set follow-ups on procurement and outreach.
The Warner's Pond Management Committee reviewed and revised a draft request for proposals for an adaptive management consultant that will develop a conceptual site model, a year‑1 plan with monitoring triggers, and recommendations for mitigation and implementation.
Delia (speaker 4), who led the RFP revision, said the town had moved to a new template and that "the new structure of the RFP does not contain any numerical quantifiers" for comparative criteria, reflecting finance guidance. Rose (speaker 8) told the committee staff were trying to get the RFP out sooner despite a busy permitting season.
Committee members pressed Delia and staff on the contractor's expected tasks. Delia said the consultant should "review all of the existing material," develop a baseline, "prepare what you've called a conceptual site model," and provide an adaptive management plan with monitoring and year‑by‑year modification triggers. Several members emphasized that the consultant should both monitor and, where needed, recommend implementable mitigation measures.
The committee agreed to circulate a revised draft, hold a focused working session on Aug. 20 to finalize edits, and aim to have the procurement posted by mid‑September. Rose explained the procurement timeline and outreach channels, noting the town typically allows a 2–3 week response window after an RFP is posted.
The RFP discussion included detailed technical items the committee wants addressed—recent bathymetry, vegetation mapping, and QA/QC for water‑quality sampling—with the expectation that respondents will identify additional sample needs and associated costs.
