Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elected Salaries topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee debates how to compare aldermanic pay — population, meeting counts or a mayor:council ratio?
Summary
Members reviewed comparator cities and debated metrics for setting council pay — population, number of meetings, meeting frequency and a proposed mayor-to-council salary ratio (3:1–4:1) — and asked for more source documentation in the spreadsheet.
Committee members reviewed a spreadsheet of comparator cities and numbers for mayor and council salaries and debated which metrics should inform Bloomington’s approach. Some members favored adding population and meeting-frequency columns; others recommended a ratio of mayor-to-council pay as a predictable benchmark.
"A 3 to 1 or a 4 to 1 ratio from the executive, the governor, whose state legislators say is pretty difficult," one committee member said when explaining the ratio concept for local application. Members agreed the spreadsheet needs complete source citations and that staff should gather salary ordinances and meeting-frequency data before the package goes to the full council.
The discussion also touched on whether pay-per-meeting or appointments and committee duties are comparable across municipalities; several members warned those items are not apples-to-apples and suggested limiting comparisons to clearer metrics such as regular meetings and population-adjusted ratios.
