Resident asks sheriff and state's attorney to explain radio encryption, requests habeas caseload data

During the public‑comment period James Simmons raised operational and transparency concerns about county communications equipment and habeas litigation trends.

Simmons said he had tried the public comment phone number and the call "just rang and nobody answered," and asked the board to test the line. He urged the sheriff to pilot radio systems that use cellular backup before committing to a multi‑year purchase agreement because, in his experience, such radios do not always perform as advertised.

Simmons also questioned the need for encrypted law‑enforcement communications, noting the potential optics of simultaneous investment in sophisticated surveillance and encrypted channels. "I would request that the sheriff comes up and provides a bit more of a robust explanation justifying why they really need such a system and why they need encrypted communication," he said.

Finally, Simmons asked the state's attorney to provide aggregated information on habeas cases (counts, trends and outcomes) so the public can assess whether habeas filings are producing a material fiscal impact, without disclosing personal or case‑level details.

The chair and auditor tested the phone line during the meeting and said the 6248 line appeared to be working at that time; commissioners directed staff to monitor call reliability.