Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners highlight ditch-law complexity after drainage conference, recall Slama v. Pine County
Summary
After attending a drainage conference, commissioners warned that judicial ditch law is complex and cited the 20-year-old Slama v. Pine County case as a precedent; commissioners urged diligence on statutes and case law and noted possible legislative changes to ease abandonment procedures.
Get email alerts on the Infrastructure topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners who attended a recent drainage conference reported that statutory and case law for judicial ditches is old and complex and that Pine County — while it has relatively few judicial ditches — should remain attentive to maintenance and statutory compliance.
"Ditch law is very old and very complex," one commissioner said, urging the board to be diligent to avoid legal pitfalls. Speakers recalled the Slama v. Pine County case (about 20 years ago) as having shaped ditch-law precedent. Commissioners also said there is discussion at the Legislature about changing abandonment procedures so ditch authorities could instigate abandonments rather than rely solely on landowner-driven petitions — a change that would substantially alter the process if enacted.
The board noted the topic for future awareness but did not take legislative action at the meeting.

