Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Parking Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Advisory board debates eliminating parking minimums, adding maximums and carving out 8th Street
Summary
Board members discussed a policy shift to eliminate parking minimums in much of the city while keeping or carving out a different approach for the 8th Street mixed-use overlay, citing trade-offs for development, neighborhood spillover and impervious-surface concerns.
Planning Advisory Board members debated policy trade-offs on Sept. 11 over whether to remove citywide parking minimums and instead set parking maximums, with special treatment for redevelopment corridors such as the 8th Street mixed-use overlay. Some members argued removing minimums would reduce construction costs and allow denser, mixed-use redevelopment; others warned the change could drive on-street spillover and stress neighborhood streets during high-demand events.
Kelly and Margaret Pearson told the board staff had surveyed comparable Florida jurisdictions and found limited examples of jurisdictions without any minimums. Pearson said the recommended incremental approach is to establish a maximum citywide while maintaining minimums (or tailored standards) for constrained redevelopment areas like 8th Street. "If we were to eliminate parking minimums entirely, this applies across the board... that we are having difficulties along 8th Street with achieving the development that we'd like to see there," Pearson said, urging the board to treat 8th Street as a focused project requiring mapping, design and potentially fee-in-lieu mechanisms to fund on-street improvements. Board members asked staff to return with scenarios and mapping for 8th Street and to consider beach-area impacts separately.
